Thursday, May 17, 2012

Desmond's power

Last night, in his 36th game of the year, Ian Desmond hit his 5th homerun of the season.  Last year, in 154 games, he had 8 homers. The year before that in 154 games, he had 10 homers.  Ian also has 11 doubles, compared to the 27 he had in both of the past two years.  Projecting out for a whole season Ian would hit around 22 homers and have almost 50 doubles. Is this power surge for real?

Let's be frank here. Ian's value is coming from that power.  His average is ok (.276 right now) but that can almost directly be attributed to the increase in power.  A couple homers turn into fly balls and he's hitting .264.  Ian also doesn't walk and that stat is worse than ever.  His walk rate is an abysmal 3.5%.  He's seeing a ridiculously small number of pitchers per at bat (3.27, 2nd lowest in the NL).  So, even though he's hitting over 20 points higher than last year, he's a bad at bat away from matching last year's OBP.

But this is all ok if he keeps slugging like he has been. Don't get me wrong, Ian is not a league leader in slugging, not even close. But this power bump turns Ian into a useful offensive player rather than the lineup hole he has been.  Can he keep this up?

His minor league stats would suggest it's possible. He had isoSLG of .168 his third go round in A+ ball, and .188 his third season in AA. His .172 right now looks reasonable in light of that.

There's nothing currently odd about his major league numbers right now either. BABIP is at .313 - about what he did the past two years. HR/FB rate is at 10.4% - higher than the past 2 years but not abnormal (like the 17.4% he had in his brief rookie stint).  That alone wouldn't explain the power surge, but Desmond is also hitting far less ground balls and a lot more fly ones (and a few more line drives).  True, flyballs tend to be outs a little more often than ground balls, but they also, with line drives, are where the power comes from.  He's swinging a lot more (both his in-the-strike-zone and out-of-the-strike-zone swing percentages are up) but his strike out rate is down a bit. So it doesn't seem to be an issue with strike zone judgement spurring this on.

I don't see anything necessarily funny here. Chances are Desmond is sitting dead red and pouncing on anything that he thinks might be a decent pitch to hit trying to drive it up and out. Most of his XBH have come off of FBs and he seems to do the best versus FBs and sliders. He is seeing less straight fastballs this year but they are mostly being replaced with cut fastballs which Ian is handling just fine. There is a chance of regression here. Given his current swing tendencies, fastballs and sliders further out of the zone, or a mix of a lot more off-speed junk could have Ian flailing away again.

Tentatively, though, I think Ian may have found a niche where he can survive in the majors. It's important to understand a couple things here. Because he gets on base so infrequently, this power bump does not make him a good offensive player, merely one you can accept having in your lineup.  Also, he's not a complete batter so like I said pitchers could figure him out. But given that Ian is not terribly threatening, and is in that position ahead of some hitters they'd rather not face with men on, chances are pitchers are going to pitch him like they pitch everyone else. That means a couple of fast pitches in/near the strike zone in every at bat and for Ian that means a couple chances at the big hit that's making him a useful part of this lineup.

8 comments:

  1. Although Ian probably will fall back into a slump at some point, or return to what we expect from him, the offense has come alive a bit, which is exciting. It seems as if Harper has improved his timing on the curveballs and sinkers and learned to not swing at them, Danny too. You and I both said it, but Espinosa has started to really come around and is hitting the ball pretty solid. In my mind, his fielding has been really strong too. However, it seems still like we are stranding a WHOLE lot of runners on base, even though we are starting to score more runs, why are the Nats so bad with multiple runners on base? Also, I was at the game tuesday, that Strasburg start was miserable. Should we get prepared for Gio to be our best Pitcher? H-Rod is an issue for sure, but if we just hold out till the all star break well get Drew back, and I can tell you for sure I will be 100% comfortable going into the 9th with a one run lead with that guy on the mound.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nattydread7:15 AM

    But is he a leadoff batter? Too few pitches?

    For a team reeling from injuries, Desmond-Harper-Zimmerman-LaRoche is not too bad in 1-2-3-4 slots.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Strasburger:

    Strasburg will be fine. I was at the game too. His command was a bit off (missed the strikezone more than usual, and left a couple pitches up), but the rain was what really did him in. He still got his strikeouts.

    Also, he probably could have pitched another inning if Davey weren't saving his innings for games they have a better chance of winning.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Strasburger: absurd to be concerned about Strasburgs one bad start every pitcher has bad starts.

    His low OBP does make it seem weird that he bats leadoff but if you are right that we will get more fastballs while battign 1st as opposed to 6th or 7th might be worth it. Would prefer a real high obp guy bat first and desmond second. Batting second he should still get good pitches to hit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. DCNatty8:45 AM

    Strasburg will be fine. If Ankle and Shark caught the first ball (AWFUL)...im guessing he gets out of the first innning with a 0 on the board. Just shows how fine a line these guys walk. He also didnt get a few border line calls...resulting in a 30 pitch inning.

    I htink Desmond wil lsit where he is all year and go thru mini-slump.s he started off hot, mini slump, now hot again. .260-.270 is fine by me if he has a bit of pop. Id love to see more walks but beggers cant be choosers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Straburger - I'm not sure I said Espinosa would definitely come around, more he should get a chance.

    Nats are bad with runners on base because they are bad in general. Really their men on #s aren't too different from their nobody on numbers.

    I think you can see Gio becoming the best pitcher, at least for this year, though like everyone else no worries about Strasburg.

    Nattydread - not really, and I'd like to see him drop down, but 8th place might in fact do him some harm.

    LGN - Desmond 2nd? Any top of the lineup spot isn't ideal, but expect him to stay in leadoff. If he says he's comfortable Davey won't move him.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous8:12 AM

    Dude you write a lot but think a little and watch very little baseball. If Desmond wanted to work the count he would. The world is not based on sabermetrics. You read Bill James get over yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Strasburger: absurd to be concerned about Strasburgs one bad start every pitcher has bad starts. His low OBP does make it seem weird that he bats leadoff but if you are right that we will get more fastballs while battign 1st as opposed to 6th or 7th might be worth it. Would prefer a real high obp guy bat first and desmond second. Batting second he should still get good pitches to hit.

    ReplyDelete