Nationals Baseball: Dr. Denard at home, Mr. Span away

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Dr. Denard at home, Mr. Span away

Browsing through Denard Span's stats I found something that was... well not troubling but certainly of interest.

2010
Home : .273 / .348 / .375
Away : .252 / .309 / .314

2011
Home : .286 / .344 / .384
Away : .250 / .317 / .343

2012
Home : .332 / .404 / .477
Away : .235 / .278 / .315

Last year was pretty crazy. At home he was Tony Gwynn.  Away he was Tony Gwynn Jr. The other years aren't as dramatic, but as you can see he's been consistently much better at home.

Was this something to worry about?  Would moving away from the friendly confines of Target Field (I just made that up!) kill Span's offense?

No
 
Or at least, I can't find any good reason to think that. There's nothing about Target Field that would explain that difference. There's no sign that it inflates offense.  It doesn't favor lefty hitters (it actually seems to favor righties but then again Span is kind of a slap-hitting lefty).  It doesn't have crazy dimensions or a strange surface that maybe he's taking advantage of.* I can't find anything about Minnesota that explains this. Sometimes you dig and find nothing and it's kind of important to accept that.

* Though I'll note here the Metrodome DID have that fast artificial turf.  Combine that and young legs and that's really why Span was a .300 hitter early on.  So if you think a return to a .290+ hitter is in the cards...I wouldn't bet on it. 

What's the reasoning? Simple. It happens. In general players hit better at home than on the road. They are comfortable there. They're not living out of a hotel. They both see the backdrop more regularly and have more than a couple games to get used to it since they are in one place during a homestand. For some guys this helps a little, for others it helps a lot and Span is one of those guys it seems to help alot. He hit better at the Metrodome as well.

Like look at a Cody Ross. In 2010 he hit alot better at Marlins Park than away. In 2011 he hit a little bit better overall at AT&T than away (and that's a tough place to hit). In 2012, he hit tons better in Fenway than away (an easy place for a righty to hit).  He's just one of these guys.

So what? So expect this next year.  I wouldn't expect the dramatic shift we saw last year from Span.  For some reason Target Field was great for hitting last year. Nationals Park is routinely very average. But I wouldn't be surprised by a difference in stats (though not same stats) a lot like 2010. Noticeably better across the board at home than away.  It's not going to make him any more or less useful for the season than the Nats expect him to be, it'll just bunch up his usefulness a bit.

5 comments:

michael k said...

For some reason I was under the impression that Target Field was large, being bad for HR but good for base hits and extra base hits. But I looked up both the field's dimensions and its stats over the last four years and that doesn't seem to be the case.

That's my contribution. I'm a contributor!

michael k said...

For some reason I was under the impression that Target Field was large, being bad for HR but good for base hits and extra base hits. But I looked up both the field's dimensions and its stats over the last four years and that doesn't seem to be the case.

That's my contribution. I'm a contributor!

michael k said...

Ok good. I was afraid that I made the least informative post of the thread. Now I feel better.

Then again, he is telling me where to get air jordans...

Harper said...

Best contribution! Also worst!

Final result : Average contribution with a huge standard error of competence.

Anonymous said...

Ϻу partner and ӏ ѕtumbled ovег here coming from a dіfferent
ωeb aԁԁress and thought I might as wеll сheck things out.
I likе what I see ѕo now i am follοωing
уou. Lоoκ forward tо checking оut
yοuг web page again.

Feel free to vіsit my blog - how to remove old acne scars