Just to do it : Royals in 5.
But the Mets could win in 5 too. I don't know. Want to pick something.
Back to analyzing the 2016 Nats a.k.a "Bryce and the 99 Questions" tomorrow.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
SECOND MOST POPULAR BLOG OF THE LAST SEASON PLAYED WITHOUT THE STUPID EXTRA-INNING GHOST RUNNER WORLD CHAMPION WASHINGTON NATIONALS
8 comments:
No idea at all. The Mets offense appears to be sold short in the predictions I've seen, since everyone wants to root for the small market club. Even so, strikeouts are fascist, so I say Royals in 6, Harvey with leaves game one after the fourth inning with a mysterious pain in his forearm.
Royals in six. Murphy can't carry the Nymets forever
LOL@Mets
Let the Mets win, lest they be tempted to spend a lot of money in the offseason after falling just short of the championship... it's better they win and get complacent and give the ownership the leeway to continue to be cheap.
I guess I'll go with KC in a longer series, but no matter what, the Mets showed us what a winning team looks like this year.
Yes, injuries greatly impacted the past two Nats seasons, but excuses only go so far, and certain Nats should probably just shut it (and Harper isn't one of them).
It wasn't MW's fault, either.
If the NL Champ Mets are LOL Mets, we must be LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!NATS
Hey we still have the 3HTH v the Mets...oh wait
LOL@SensitiveMetsBandwagoners
Post a Comment