After that disappointing finish to the home stand, the Nats head to Miami for a four game set. I see this as a season-setting series. The Marlins are very bad, but after a 0-9 start they are 6-11. That's like "usual worst team in the majors this year" as opposed to the "is this a historically bad team?" their record might suggest.
The Marlins' starting pitching is fine and back of the pen is fairly reliable and they might be coming around depth-wise on both of these to form a more average ish squad, maybe even good. This is in line with the last couple of years. But their offense remains terrible after they decided to not put money into the what was the obvious problem the past couple seasons. Presumably this cheapness is what ran off people like Jeter and Ng who thought they might be committed to something other than "trying to be the next Rays or A's" There isn't anything about the offense really under-performing. Old friend Josh Bell should be better, and Arraez could hit a bit more, but this is who they are. They are a team that can't score. The minors aren't sending help. The Nats pitching should keep them in check.
I call this a season-setting series because how the Nats do here could define what this season is about. A 3-1 series win will put the Nats at 13-15 and the Marlins at 7-23. That's would give the Nats quite a lead over their challengers for the bottom of the NL East. It would set the Nats up for a "ok are they a 70, 75, or even 80 win team" type of season. A 1-3 series loss would put the teams at 11-17 and 9-21 respectively and set the season up for a basement battle.
In other news. Gore looks really good, huh? Fancy stats aren't telling us much different. His BABIP is actually HIGH which would suggest fewer hits in the future but the HR/FB rate is low and he's giving up a fair number of FB/LDs so that should swing the other way. Whichever you think is more important would lead you to believe how close he stays to what he has been.
It's been noted that if the Nats can come out of 2024 with a 1/2 Gore and a star Abrams confirmed, that's a good outcome. Early returns are promising, but let's see Gore do something he's never done - throw over 150 innings - because the Nats of the future need a 1 or 2 Gore who is actually on the mound in practice, not in theory.
5 comments:
Without Luzardo seems like we should have a good shot at the 3-1 outcome
Is Joey Meneses a bad hitter having good luck or a good hitter having bad luck?
One the one hand:
Low-ish batting average.
Low OPS.
Low XBH.
On the other hand:
A RBI stud
Many hard-hit balls
So far, so good!
@Harper, what do you think a fair and plausible extension for Gore would be? 100/5 with a couple $25M team options?
I like Gore and see the potential in him, but am not ready to extend just yet. I need to see a season where he is consistently good throughout and stays healthy
5/100 sounds pretty high given what he’s shown so far. Of course could’ve said the same about Abrams last year and we see how that turned out..
Post a Comment