Mock Down I think I said before something like "start Mock for a month and if he isn't ready send him down and don't look back". Well imagine that by a "month" I meant a "day" and you have the Nats' view. I've never been a fan of Mock but this seems premature doesn't it? I'm getting freakin' tired of this.
It's not about Mock, so much. He could surely be bad enough to send back down. That's not the point. It comes down to this: If the Nats felt strongly enough to let Mock start and a mere one start later feel strong enough to send him down then it seems to me that they have no idea what they are doing. It's nice they can correct their mistakes, but they shouldn't be making so many obvious ones to begin with.
Morse Down, Bernandina Up Just let the guy start. What does it matter? Is Willie Harris the future? Is Willy Taveras? AND NOT FOR 2 GAMES THEN SEND HIM DOWN ACTING LIKE YOU DID SOMETHING SMART.
Super-Sub Guzman I realize Guzman has had a nice start but does this team really need to get Guzman as many at bats as possible?
I think it does.
Dye says no Whatever. It's his choice. The Nats aren't a playoff team and are on the other side of the country from his family. But I have a problem with this
When you get offers from a lot of teams that are in the $1 million range, that's a negative in itself, no matter whatYou can't say something like that. Especially right after talking about the economy being tough. Rich people.